XRP Ledger 漏洞:十年未被发现,威胁 1000 亿美元供应上限
Why a bug that could have threatened XRP's 100 billion supply cap stayed hidden for years
XRP Ledger 存在了一个长达十年的漏洞,可能导致攻击者创建数十亿 XRP,威胁到其 1000 亿美元的代币供应上限。该漏洞需要大量精心构造的交易才能触发,攻击者可能通过虚假代币销售获得巨额收益。研究人员于 9 月 22 日报告了这一漏洞,RippleX 在修复漏洞后确认没有发现利用或未经授权创建 XRP 的情况。
3 min pagbasa

Buod
- An XRP Ledger bug that went undiscovered for more than a decade could have allowed an attacker to create billions of XRP, undermining the cryptocurrency’s 100 billion token supply cap.
- The integer-overflow flaw required hundreds of carefully constructed transactions, allowing manipulated costs to wrap to a near-zero value while seller accounts received full payments.
- Researchers reported the vulnerability on Sept. 22, and RippleX patched it after finding no evidence of exploitation or unauthorized XRP creation on a public network.
A bug that could have let an attacker print new XRP (XRP) out of nothing sat in the XRP Ledger for more than a decade without anyone noticing because normal user activity never came close to triggering it, according to XRP Ledger Foundation.
The 11-year-old bug mattered because it threatened the core rule XRP holders rely on: that the total supply can never exceed the 100 billion coins created at the blockchain’s debut in 2012. It was uncovered Sept. 22 by researcher Cayden Liao and Veria AI and reported internally.
No damage was done, according to RippleX, which shipped the fix. No new XRP was created and about 99.986 billion XRP remain in circulation today, the foundation said.
The XRP Ledger (XRPL) is an open-source, decentralized layer-1 blockchain. Its native token, XRP, was built so that no new tokens can ever be minted. The coin is primarily used to pay transaction fees and bridge currency trades on the ledger's built-in decentralized exchange (DEX).
However, the bug, believed to have existed since 2015, provided a way around that, at least in theory.
Here’s how it could have worked
The bug stemmed from a vulnerability known as an “integer overflow,” which, like an old arcade game’s score counter, resets to zero every time it hits its maximum.
In the XRP Ledger case, the flaw meant that once a transaction size exceeded the system's maximum allowed numerical limit, the value wrapped around to a very small number. That bypassed standard fund checks, crediting sellers their full XRP amounts while charging buyers next to nothing, effectively minting the difference out of thin air and artificially inflating the total XRP supply.
An attacker could have set up dummy accounts to post fake token sales worth astronomical amounts of XRP. Then, acting as the buyer, the attacker could have paid in XRP, buying all tokens at once. The ledger would credit the seller accounts with billions of valid XRP and, overwhelmed by the sheer amount of XRP, would have registered a total cost of only a fraction of a cent for the buyer.
By bypassing standard fund checks, the system would effectively mint the difference out of thin air, allowing the attacker to walk away with billions of new XRP to liquidate on external exchanges.
Why it went unnoticed?
The bug went unnoticed mainly because it required a massive scale of action to trigger, the XRP Foundation said in an explainer published Monday.
“No normal payment comes anywhere near triggering it. It took hundreds of deliberately constructed operations,” it said.
The ledger’s own safeguards missed it too. As CoinDesk reported last week, the check that runs after every transaction to confirm no new XRP has appeared relied on the same miscounted total, so it saw nothing unusual. A separate limit on how much XRP a single account can receive didn’t trigger either, because the potential attack would have spread the XRP across hundreds of accounts.
The foundation noted that artificial intelligence is making it faster to find such flaws for both "the bad guys and the good guys." To ensure safety going forward, the foundation plans to aggressively apply AI adversarial testing, implement formal verification and strengthen its bug bounty program.
“You’ll hear a lot more about this as we progress,” it said.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
来源:CoinDesk · coindesk.com